Head of the River Communities Group
Plastics are useful materials, but they now pollute our world − on land, and in oceans, rivers and lakes. There are great concerns about the damage they might be doing to the environment. While traditional plastics are non-degradable, strides have been made in developing alternative biodegradable polymers. How can we accurately measure the impact of all plastics? Where are they coming from, how do they degrade, what effects do they have, and can we stop the flow of pollution?
Multi-disciplinary research at Queen Mary, incorporating the work of polymer chemists, geographers, biochemists, microbiologists and environmental biologists, has led to new insight into these crucial issues.
Professor Iwan Jones of Queen Mary’s River Communities Group is the Project Lead on the Preventing Plastic Pollution Project (PPP). The PPP project has adopted a catchment-based approach to understand the sources and impacts of plastic pollution, and to propose sustainable solutions to reduce it. By examining how the plastic arrives from source to sea, the project will identify and target hotspots for plastic and embed behaviour change in local communities and businesses to reduce the flow of plastic
PPP is developing a model to gather data from citizen scientists on the amount and likely sources of plastic pollution in nine areas across the Channel region. The information gathered in these areas will allow the cross-Channel partnerships to tackle some of the four million tonnes of plastic waste that enters the sea via rivers every year.
The €14m project was approved by the Interreg France (Channel) England Programme, which has committed €9.9m in funding through the European Regional Development Fund and involves 18 organisations including Defra, the Environment Agency, Office Français de la Biodiversité, a marine national park, regional councils and charities.
Traditional plastics, such as the low-density polyethylene used for plastic bags, are non-degradable, and scientists have worked hard to develop biodegradable alternatives such as crop-based hydrodegradable, compostable plastics and oxo-biodegradable plastic.
In 2020 alone, 2.11 million tonnes of these new materials were manufactured. But how do these products break down? While lab testing shows promising results, how quickly do they degrade under natural conditions and what breakdown products do they produce?
There is an increasing concern that biodegradable polymers may also be damaging for the environment. Like traditional plastics, they may not degrade completely and can thus form microparticles. They may also generate toxic metabolic by-products and impact on biota. The carbon they generate may be available to microbial communities. Currently, the wider impact on biogeochemical cycles is yet to be quantified.
The Biodegradable Plastics as emerging Environmental Pollutants (BioPEP) project seeks to evaluate the environmental impact of biodegradable plastics. Queen Mary’s interdisciplinary team includes:
Up until recently, it was extremely difficult to measure the scale of the problem. Inconsistent methods were used to sample, measure and analyse the concentrations of microplastics in the environment. Reliable and consistent scientific data on the scale of the problem and the risk to the environment were needed to formulate policy to control microplastic pollution.
Between 2018 and 2020, Defra commissioned Professor Jones, together with colleagues including Professor Kate Spencer of Geography, to carry out a systematic analysis of reliable global data, looking at the analysis, prevalence and impact of microplastics in freshwaters and estuaries. There were three key evidence reviews, which asked the following questions:
The reviews showed that:
Professors Jones and Resmini also looked at the types of microplastics and where they are found in rivers and estuaries: it appears that biota might be avoiding certain types of microplastic.
The research demonstrated the urgent need to standardise methods of monitoring microplastics and their environmental impact. They identified important gaps in our understanding of pollution sources and the fate of microplastics in the environment.
[Professor Jones’s team]... identified gaps in our current understanding of the sources and fate of microplastics … The findings by Dr Professor Jones and Professor Resmini have highlighted key issues that are being considered as we develop policy. — Dr Steve Morris, Senior Scientific Advisor at Defra
What does the size of a plant genome tell us about its chances of survival? As land use, climate and other anthropogenic changes alter the distribution of plants across the British Isles, can scientists predict future patterns?
Microplastics are tiny plastics particles created when plastics degrade and escape into the environment, releasing toxic pollutants into our soil and water. Within 30 years, 12bn tonnes of microplastic could have entered the environment.
Professor Jonathan Grigg and Professor Chris Griffiths have played a pivotal role in making London’s air healthier for us all – and particularly for our children. Air pollution is the top environmental risk to human health in the UK.
We need to increase renewable energy generation to meet net zero targets and to make energy more affordable. Discover how Joe Briscoe, Reader in Energy Materials and Devices at Queen Mary is researching how solar power generation can be made more efficient.